Filed under: airlines news, cheap flights, main | Tags: flights, news, travel
against the Euro many people are believed to be planning a holiday in the UK this year and for that reason Jersey is expected to have a bumper summer and see an increase in domestic tourism. One airline less flying to Jersey means that others who fly other airports will be rubbing their hand together and seeing pound note signs before their very eyes!BMI claim their decision was taken with a heavy heart and are sad to be leaving Jersey but simply do not see the Heathrow to jersey route being profitable in the foreseeable future.
Now, at the same time as Jersey goes BMI are increasing flights to Aberdeen to three each day from Birmingham. Aberdeen is the oil capital of the UK and flights are generally aimed at the business market who are prepared to pay much higher fares that those who fly on leisure flights (Jersey for instance). Cynics would say that BMI aren’t really sad to lose Jersey and it’s low yield passengers when it can pander to the high rollers in the business sector by transferring aircraft from one airport to another to increase capacity and revenue. Whatever you say you gotta agree “Thats business”.
Filed under: airlines news, cheap flights, main | Tags: flights, news, travel
Singapore Airlines (SIA) is cutting more than 200 flights to Australia, China, Europe and India in response to falling passenger numbers, according to the company and travel agents.
Faced with the global economic slowdown, the carrier informed travel agents this week that 214 flights in all would be cut between now and March. It said Thursday that December passenger numbers were down 7.5 percent year-on-year.
“We don’t want to be flying half-empty planes around the world any longer than we have to, because it increases our cost burden at a time when we can least afford that,” company spokesman Stephen Forshaw told AFP.
“We want to make sure we match changes in capacity with the changes in demand that are occurring as a result of the economic slowdown,” he said.
Agents said flights would be cut between now and March to Hong Kong, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Mumbai, New Delhi, Perth, Sydney, Brisbane, London and Zurich.
SIA said Thursday it carried 1.61 million passengers last month, compared with 1.74 million in December 2007.
It also filled almost 80 percent of seats, down 4.4 percentage points year-on-year.
The city-state’s flag carrier said in November that net profit for the fiscal second quarter ending September fell 36.2 percent from the previous year, as the airline felt the pinch from the economic downturn.
Alicia Seah, a senior vice president at CTC Holidays travel agency, said many Singaporeans were opting for closer and cheaper holiday destinations such as Malaysia, Indonesia and Vietnam.
“What we see is that passengers are slowing down after Chinese New Year,” Seah said. “They are tightening their belts.”
The pilot, identified as former US Air Force pilot Captain Chesley B “Sully” Sullenberger III, who has worked for US Airways since 1980, steered the plane clear of the skyscrapers of midtown Manhattan, landing in the river.
Praise for the pilot was universal. New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said: “There’s no reason to believe this is something we should not thank God for.
“It would appear that the pilot did a masterful job landing the plane in the river and making sure everyone got out.”
Alberto Pinero, a passenger, said that within a couple minutes of take-off there was an explosion and flames coming from the engines. He said: “You just heard a loud bang and the plane shook a bit.”
Passengers could smell smoke, and “the plane just started turning. Somehow, the plane stayed afloat and we were all able to get on a raft,” Mr Pinero said. “It’s just incredible now that everyone’s still alive.”
The plane was seen gyrating over the river, and onlookers watched as it glided down, landing close to a ferry port, allowing boats to rush to the rescue.
“The pilot was a real hero. It could have come down on Manhattan,” Patricia Horotan, owner of New York’s Blue Matrix technology company, told The Scotsman. “It was basically a landing on the river.”
The plane had 148 passengers, including at least one baby, and seven crew. Immediately after it hit the water the doors opened and orange rescue chutes inflated, allowing the passengers to tumble out.
Some onlookers high in office blocks were amazed to see the plane gliding down below them to hit the water.
“It just kind of glided into the water,” said Abby Zettwoch. “It came down and just started floating there. The next thing we knew we saw people getting out, it seemed well organised.
“The response of the ferries was incredible. They were here within seconds. We couldn’t believe the response.
“We started seeing people on the wings, getting into the ferries, it was so bizarre.” Eyewitnesses said the fact that not one life was lost was extraordinary.
“The plane had to land in choppy waters with temperatures at -6C.
If the plane had sunk and ferries not been instantly on the scene the strong currents in the river could have swept passengers away.
The plane landed not far from the cluster of skyscrapers around the Empire State Building, giving thousands of office workers a grandstand view looking down on the landing.
Ben Vonklemperer watched the crash in amazement from his office window. “It might sound strange, but only part of me thought this was an emergency because of how gradual and how slow and how nearly parallel this plane was with the water.
“I heard a rumour that it was part of a movie shoot. If you want to land a plane on the water this is exactly how to do it.”
The drama lasted less than three minutes. Shortly after lifting off Capt Sullenberger reportedly radioed air traffic officials to say he had suffered a “double bird strike” thought to refer to both engines being clogged with a flock of birds, thought to be geese.
But seconds later as controllers scrambled to clear other flights out of the way, he radioed to say he would try to land at Teterboro, New Jersey, because it was closer.
That was his last transmission and the pilot then steadied the plane over the Hudson River, level with 90th Street, bringing it down on a steep curve to land 50 blocks later.
Passengers said that seconds before the impact Capt Sullenberger called “brace for impact” on the intercom. Rescuers were on the scene so quickly that most passengers were able to jump from rescue rafts on to ferries
“We’ve had a miracle on the Hudson,” said New York’s governor David Paterson. The plane itself remained afloat last night, and was towed to a nearby wharf to be inspected.
Five major airliner accidents have been caused by bird strikes since 1975. More than 56,000 bird strikes were reported in the US in the past ten years.
The plane’s route was the same as that of the American Airlines Flight 11 that flew down the Hudson to hit the World Trade Centre on 11 September, 2001. However, the accident will have flight controllers worried as New York is one of the world’s busiest air corridors.
Accident that triggers memories of Potomac
IN January 1982 during a snowstorm, an Air Florida Boeing 737 plunged into the ice-covered Potomac River in central Washington killing 78 people.
The city was traumatised by the tragedy – a crash that many safety experts had feared.
The plane plunged into the river midway between the White House and the Pentagon seconds after take-off from the capital’s National Airport, and after smashing into the commuter-packed 14th Street bridge, one of the city’s main arteries between downtown DC and suburban Virginia.
Six motorists on the bridge were killed as the plane sliced the roofs off their cars. Five of the aircraft’s passengers survived after being plucked from the icy river by civilians and rescue workers.
The National Transportation Safety Board determined that the cause of the accident was pilot error, as the crew failed to use the anti-ice mechanism and large amounts of ice and snow formed in the engines.
Undisputed world-leading jet-liner
THE Airbus A320 is the undisputed leader in the single-aisle jet liner market, with more than 3,200 having been sold worldwide.
It is a short to medium-range commercial passenger aircraft manufactured by Airbus in France. It has a seating capacity for 142-150 passengers.
It was the first airliner to fully feature the glass cockpit with a digital fly-by-wire flight control system, where the pilot controls flight surfaces through the use of electronic signals rather than mechanically with pulleys and hydraulic systems.
The initial Air France A320 crashed during an air show in Habsheim, France, killing three passengers.
It was the first narrowbody airliner with a significant amount of its structure made from fibre composites and the first with a containerised cargo system.
BAA is expected to fast-track a third runway at Heathrow after the government yesterday backed expanding the airport as soon as possible after 2015. The transport secretary, Geoff Hoon, recommended that the airport owner “brought forward” a planning application for the runway after he made the surprise decision not to increase flights on the existing runways.
He said his refusal to allow more arrivals and departures on the existing site in west London made the need for a new runway all the more urgent.
Hoon brushed off concerns about the environmental impact of expanding Britain’s largest airport by announcing that a third runway could be finished at the earliest in six years’ time.
The £8bn development would add an estimated 350 flights a day at Heathrow, increase annual passenger numbers from 66 million to about 82 million, and put thousands more vehicles on the heavily congested roads surrounding the airport.
But Hoon told the Commons: “Doing nothing will damage our economy and will have no impact whatsoever on climate change.”
However, cabinet members who oppose the third runway, led by the environment secretary Hilary Benn and energy secretary Ed Miliband, won some concessions. The government attached three green “sweeteners”. The third runway would operate at half capacity when opened, raising the total number of flights from 480,000 a year to 605,000, rather than the 702,000 intended; aircraft using the new runway would meet strict greenhouse gas emissions standards; and carbon dioxide emissions from UK aviation would be limited to 2005 levels by 2050.
“This gives us the toughest climate change regime for aviation anywhere in the world,” said Hoon.
He said the Civil Aviation Authority and the Environment Agency would be able to block the opening of the third runway if it threatened to breach noise and air pollution guidelines. Taking the runway to full capacity could not happen before 2020 and had to be approved by the Climate Change Committee, the independent body set up to monitor the government’s sustainability record. If the committee believed the aviation industry was not making sufficient progress towards its 2050 carbon dioxide reduction target it would block the increase.
Yesterday’s announcement allows BAA to push ahead with a planning application for the 2,200-metre runway, north of the existing site, and a sixth terminal for Heathrow.
However, it is understood the application will not be ready until 2011 at the earliest. A planning inquiry is expected to last two years with runway and terminal construction taking another three.
The government gave the go-ahead to the £8bn project after a consultation to determine whether it would breach guidelines on air and noise pollution and public transport access. It decided the expansion would meet this criteria, which includes EU guidelines on nitrogen oxide. The noise limits stated that the size of area exposed to 57db had to be no more than about 46 sq miles. BAA faces a planning inquiry and an expected judicial review of the decision brought by local councils.
The announcement by Hoon was accompanied by public transport measures that instantly drew criticism from green campaigners, who said they were half-baked, unfunded or already announced.
The plans include a £6bn increase in road capacity (already announced) involving use of the hard-shoulder on parts of the M1 and M6. There would also be a new company called High Speed 2, for the development of a London-to-Birmingham 200mph high-speed rail link scheme via Heathrow. Additionally, Hoon announced more studies on electrifying the Great Western and Midland Mainline rail lines.
Hoon said High Speed 2 would report on progress by the end of the year. But rail industry doubts funding can be found for such a project costing an estimated £5bn alone to run from London to Heathrow.
Environmental groups said the government had made a firm commitment on Heathrow but given lukewarm backing to the public transport concessions.
Stephen Joseph, executive director of the Campaign for Better Transport, said: “We have got a clear commitment to expand Heathrow and some vague promises to consider high-speed rail and electrification. It takes us in the wrong direction, which is away from a low-carbon economy.”
The transport minister, Lord Adonis, said critics of the high-speed proposal were “completely wrong”. He added: “You cannot build a £20bn railway until you have a detailed, credible and environmentally sustainable plan.” However, the line could take an estimated 10 years to build and not open until after 2020.
The government also unveiled a £250m scheme for low-carbon vehicles.
The most significant concession by Hoon was the refusal to introduce a scheduling change which would have increased flights from Heathrow’s existing runways by more than 100 a day.